Myth #4: the pre-civil war era was the low point of us race relations slavery was a low point, no doubt, but the era between 1890 and 1940 was a nadir of race relations, loewen said tiny. Slavery was certainly a much debated topic of the day slavery, was intertwined with the issue of what a state actually was and what rights a state had in our country. Republican senate nominee corey stewart said that he doesn't believe that the civil war was fought over the issue of slavery, arguing that it was mostly about states' rights in a monday. The civil war started because the south was being taxed more to pay for the all the industrial revolutions in the north southerners got mad and receded the reason slaves were brought into the picture was because lincoln knew the only way to bring the south back was to abolish slavery strictly because the slaves were the people doing all the work.
Slavery was the civil war's cause despite revisionists saying otherwise historian adam goodheart, who has a new book on the critical year of 1861 said he thinks part of the reason for that. The war would be fought to prevent those states from seceding, not to destroy the institution of slavery the war would be fought over different interpretations of our founding document. Two acts of congress were passed during the civil war, one in 1864 (13 stat 11) and one in 1866 (14 stat 321) which allowed slave owners whose slaves enlisted or were drafted into the union military to file a claim against the federal government for loss of the slave's services.
Since the civil war did end slavery, many americans think abolition was the union's goal but the north initially went to war to hold the nation together abolition came later. The american civil war was fought because of a fundamental breakdown in trust democracies depend on the minority's trust that the majority will not screw them over it was fought because the southern slave states did not trust the democratic process. When the civil war commenced in april 1861, the issue of slavery again forced its way to the surface the north fought initially with the intention of doing nothing more than preserving the union without touching the institution of slavery.
I am arguing that the american civil war was fought mainly because of slavery i'm not saying that the civil war was about slavery, but that the issue of slavery was the main catalyst for the war. The outbreak of the civil war forever changed the future of the american nation the war began as a struggle to preserve the union, not a struggle to free the slaves, but many in the north and south felt that the conflict would ultimately decide both issues. The whole issue of secession that began before the war and started and lead to the war was about states rights and that included the right to allow slavery so slavery was very much an issue long before the civil war began. Slavery in the constitution guaranteed future conflict over the issue and was ultimately one of the primary catalysts for war the war began because a compromise did not exist that could.
By the onset of the civil war, southern slaveholders believed that african slavery was one of the great organizing institutions in world history, superior to the free society of the north. Proof that the civil war was fought over slavery but not slavery the issue echoed just a few years ago when there's actually a way to test whether or not the civil war was about slavery.
While many still debate the ultimate causes of the civil war, pulitzer prize-winning author james mcpherson writes that, the civil war started because of uncompromising differences between the free and slave states over the power of the national government to prohibit slavery in the territories that had not yet become states when abraham. Slavery was the major cause of the american civil war, with the south seceding to form a new country to protect slavery, and the north refusing to allow that historians generally agree that other economic conflicts were not a major cause of the war.
But to say that slavery was the sole cause of the civil war overlooks other stark differences that divided the north and south in the lead-up to it historians have speculated that even had the slavery question been resolved peacefully, war or secession still might have occurred during the westward expansion. The argument over whether slavery was the primary cause of the civil war is one of the most controversial topics in american history it is a subject that has been debated since the war first began in 1861. Slavery played the central role during the american civil warthe primary catalyst for secession was slavery, especially southern political leaders' resistance to attempts by northern antislavery political forces to block the expansion of slavery into the western territories.